Today’s Topic: What are Executive Orders?
And now, your daily dose of legalese: This article does not create an attorney-client relationship with any reader. In other words, although I am a lawyer, I’m not your lawyer. In fact, we barely know each other. If you need personalized legal advice, contact an attorney in your community.
Controversy Over Executive Orders
President Obama’s recent proposals to use executive orders to deal with gun violence and climate change have led to controversy on Capitol Hill, with one congressman even suggesting that impeachment might be appropriate. In this episode, I’ll explain what “executive orders” are, and why they’re often controversial.
Sponsor: This episode is brought to you by GoDaddy.com. GoDaddy.com offers everything you need to make a name for yourself on the Web, including domain name registration, website hosting, and more. Get 20% off your hosting plan purchase at GoDaddy.com by using the code hostpod61 at checkout.
What are Executive Orders?
Executive orders constitute one category of “presidential directive,” which is a broad term referring to all written instructions and declarations issued by the president of the United States. Although the Constitution does not expressly authorize executive orders, they are arguably implied by those provisions in the Constitution that give the president power to run the executive branch, command the army, and manage foreign relations. How on earth could anybody do those jobs without putting things in writing?
FDR Issued the Most Executive Orders
Not surprisingly, every president since George Washington has issued written directives of one sort or another. It was Abraham Lincoln, however, who is credited with coining the term “executive order” in 1862. As a wartime leader, Lincoln had to issue numerous orders in his role as Commander in Chief. In modern history, the highest number of executive orders was issued by Woodrow Wilson – who was president during World War I – and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who served during World War II. Indeed, FDR tops the charts at 3,728 executive orders. Even taking into account the fact that FDR held office longer than any other president, he still issued more orders per year than any other president.
Separation of Powers Concerns
Executive orders are sometimes controversial; particularly when the president appears to be encroaching on the powers of the legislative branch. Under the separation of powers doctrine, only Congress can exercise legislative power; that is, only Congress can make laws, or change existing laws, impose taxes or direct federal spending. At times, presidents are tempted to veer into that territory. In 1995, for example, President Clinton issued an executive order prohibiting companies from hiring replacement workers for workers who went on strike. The problem was that this order contradicted federal labor law – and only Congress has the power to change that law. The executive order was eventually overturned by a unanimous decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit.
President Obama’s “Executive Actions”
Which brings us to the most recent debate. In January 2013, President Obama unveiled a slate of proposals aimed at reducing gun violence – the proposals emerged from a month-long study initiated after the Newtown shooting tragedy. Gun control is always a controversial topic, as I discussed in an earlier episode entitled, Who Can Own a Gun?, but in this case, the president seeks to achieve many of his goals through a list of 23 “executive actions,” many of which are executive orders.
Although many of the proposed actions were vaguely-worded, some of them arguably deal with policy matters within Congress’s domain, such as the scope of federal background checks for firearm purchases. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky proposed legislation to nullify the president’s executive actions, citing separation-of-powers concerns. One member of the House of Representatives even suggested that he might initiate impeachment proceedings against the president, but he later dropped that idea. I should mention that this isn’t the first time this has happened. During the presidency of George W. Bush, very-similar allegations were made about the president abusing his powers through executive orders.
Just a few weeks after the gun proposals, President Obama proposed additional executive orders in his State of the Union address, particularly in the area of climate change. Here again, the president’s remarks provoked controversy because climate change is seen as a legislative, rather than executive matter. Indeed, the President called on Congress to take action on environmental and energy matters, but then declared tha, if Congress fails to act, he would start issuing executive orders. If that’s the way things play out, you can be sure that congressional resolutions will start flying, with complaints about the president usurping legislative power.内容来自 听力课堂网：http://www.tingclass.net/show-8675-251858-1.html