UNIT11
Acting Today for Tomorrow
Protecting the natural environment,
the ecology of a country, 
is a major concern 
for every country these days. 
It is mandatory not to 
minimize the importance of clean air, 
clean water, and clean land. 
It is a sad commentary on today's society 
that industries have been permitted 
to contaminate our natural surroundings. 
A dreadful discrepancy exists 
between the importance placed on economic development 
and the protection of the environment's heritage. 
If allowed to proceed unchecked, 
the public will eventually inherit a major catastrophe. 
Even countries who practice strict pollution 
control measures may still be affected 
by countries adjacent to or adjoining them,
when air pollution permeates the air.
It is important for media coverage 
to compile accurate data 
to enable the public to boycott 
increased irresponsible industrialization. 
To disguise the people's safety calling it progress 
will eventually lead to many casualties.
Canada has a land and water mass of 9 970 610 km2, 
with a population of 30 million people. 
This is a country where the ratio of people 
compared to the mass of the land is very low. 
Can you conceive that 
in such a gigantic land 
that a garbage problem exists? 
I wish that I could reassure you that 
the answer is in the negative. 
The commodity most needed 
to address this problem is space. 
However, as urban areas grow, 
the abundance of waste also increases. 
Where once ample disposal sites were available, 
now every municipal government 
is scrambling to comply with
and uphold local and national health regulations. 
Large metropolitan cities 
are having an especially difficult time. 
Local recycling programs have been authorized 
in many localities to safeguard the country's ecology.
Even after the establishment of such token measures, 
reports from five consecutive years 
have indicated only negligible progress 
in solving this very perplexing problem.
If we are to seriously address the problem 
we will need to minimize 
the amount of refuse we dispose of. 
New areas will need 
to be allocated for this purpose. 
The database of information collected
should be detailed enough 
to responsibly direct our future actions.
Every community, whether large or small, 
is searching for a solution to this problem. 
Municipalities, in attempting to appraise  the situation, 
have spent countless years in research,
expending both time and money, 
looking for a homogeneous answer. 
The public, hoping to avoid the tragic consequences 
of a manipulated decision, 
refuses to give enthusiastic support 
to most proposals. 
Solicitors are hired to prepare confidential reports 
to convince the public to accept the municipalities suggestions. 
The choice of a specific piece of farmland 
as a landfill site often causes 
an instantaneous hysterical reaction. 
At local meetings citizens reproach 
government officials yelling their disapproval 
at the choice of a specific site. 
They vent their anger 
but are not always able 
to mobilize sufficient public support 
to effect a wise and acceptable decision.
Even though researchers claim that 
lined pits will not cause a drainage problem, 
the room for error is marginal. 
One flaw in the plan could be responsible 
for an epidemic or worse, 
causing multiple deaths. 
Any leaching from a landfill pit 
will create recurring difficulties 
in polluting a farmer's well and the ground water. 
Polluted water flowing into lakes 
will affect fish and wildlife 
and will hinder the sportsman's pleasures. 
To articulate their concerns beforehand, 
will hopefully avoid grief in the future. 
A veiled threat to public health 
immediately creates a bias 
towards protecting the people's safety 
and interests and establishing an educated suspicion.