金融时报:“糖税”为肥胖减重？

所属教程:金融时报原文阅读

浏览:

2021年10月30日

手机版

扫描二维码方便学习和分享

“糖税”为肥胖减重？

是时候政府出面解决儿童超重和肥胖现象了！英国国会议员建议政府应该采取强制措施：包括对含糖饮料进行征税，以及控制不健康食品和饮料的降价促销活动等，打击儿童身上的小肥肉。

测试中可能遇到的词汇和知识：

obesity 肥胖

waistline腰围

epidemic流行的

nanny保姆

countenance赞同

uneven不均匀的

confectionery甜食

conjunction汇合点

The compelling case for a British sugar tax （616words）

Obesity is one of the biggest threats to public health in the UK. After 30 years of expanding waistlines, one in four adults is now chronically overweight. It is an epidemic that costs Britain's National Health Service £5.1bn every year, and is growing fast.

The government is slowly waking up to the scale of the problem. A misplaced desire not to be seen to “nanny” the public has until now muted politicians' responses. But support is gathering for the idea of some form of sugar tax. For all David Cameron's public reluctance to countenance such a measure, it is something the prime minister should heed.

The idea of intervention may offend liberal souls. In fact, the state is already engaged — not least out of an understandable desire to promote better public health. There are rules in place about advertising unhealthy food to children, and the government has persuaded producers voluntarily to label the nutritional value of their products.

Still, this falls far short of what is needed to tackle the epidemic. Health experts and public campaigners are now calling for a tax on sugar. Endorsed by British doctors and Public Health England, a government body, the proposal would impose a 20 per cent levy on full-sugar soft drinks. A committee of MPs joined their ranks this week, urging the government to act.

Unsurprisingly, the idea is strongly opposed by the food and drink industry. Bosses claim that a levy would do little to shrink bulging waistlines. It would just be a highly regressive impost, bearing down on the wallets of the less well off.

The evidence on the policy is admittedly uneven. Granted, taxes do scale down on consumption. When Mexico introduced a 10 per cent levy on fizzy drinks last year, volumes fell 12 per cent. What is less obvious is the impact on waistlines, not least because the measure occurred too recently for meaningful data to have emerged.

As for the impact on the poor, it is hard to deny that they would be the most affected. The less well-off are big consumers of fizzy drinks, and these products account for a larger part of their disposable income. At the same time, children from the poorest families are twice as likely to become obese as their better-off classmates. It is the less affluent who have the most to gain from the fight against flab.

The idea of the state influencing the weekly shop may stick in the craw. However, something else already holds a large sway over taste buds. A third of confectionery purchases are impulse buys related to advertising. Public Health England estimates that buy-one-get-one-free promotions are responsible for increasing household food and drink consumption by 22 per cent, adding 6 per cent more sugar to Britain's already over-sweet diet.

True, a sugar tax is only part of the story. To tackle the UK's obesity epidemic, a multi-pronged approach is needed. Higher prices on fizzy drinks should complement regulatory changes limiting promotional offers and a more comprehensive labelling initiative. Some suggestions, such as national healthy food standards to be implemented across schools and the NHS, may actually be even bolder than a levy on fizzy drinks.

Britons consume far too much sugar. On average adults eat and drink three times as much of it as health experts recommend. The health and spending implications of the epidemic are clear. It is now time for the government toact. It would be unfair to expect a tax on a single product to transform the eating habits of an entire population. But in conjunction with other measures, it would be a much-needed start.

请根据你所读到的文章内容，完成以下自测题目：

1.How many people might be chronically overweight if there are 20 adults?

A.5

B.2

C.15

D.1

答案(1)

2.What is Cameron's attitude towards the tax on sugar?

A.moved

B.agreeable

C.chuffed

D.skeptical