英语听力 学英语,练听力,上听力课堂! 注册 登录
> 在线听力 > 有声读物 > 世界名著 > 译林版·林肯传 >  第13篇

双语·林肯传 13

所属教程:译林版·林肯传

浏览:

2022年05月17日

手机版
扫描二维码方便学习和分享

13

In 1854, a tremendous thing happened to Lincoln. It came about as a result of the repeal of the Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise, in brief, was this:

In 1819, Missouri had wanted to come into the Union as a slave State. The North had opposed its doing so and the situation became serious. Finally, the ablest public men of that day arranged what is now known as the Missouri Compromise. The South got what it wanted: the admission of Missouri as a slave State. The North got what it wanted: thereafter slavery was never to be permitted in the West anywhere north of the southern boundary of Missouri.

People thought that would stop the quarreling about slavery, and it did—for a while. But now, a third of a century later, Stephen A. Douglas secured the repeal of the Compromise, and made it possible for a new area lying west of the Mississippi and equal in size to the original thirteen States, to be blighted with the curse of slavery. He fought long and hard in Congress for the repeal. The struggle lasted for months. Once during the bitter debates in the House of Representatives, members leaped on top of their desks, knives flashed, and guns were drawn. But finally, after an impassioned plea by Douglas, lasting from midnight until almost dawn, the Senate passed his bill on March 4, 1854. It was a tremendous event. Messengers ran through the streets of the slumbering city of Washington, shouting the news. Cannon in the Navy Yard boomed to salute the dawn of a new era—a new era that was to be drenched in blood.

Why did Douglas do it? No one seems to know. Historians in skullcaps are still arguing about it. Of this much, however, we are certain: Douglas hoped to be elected President in 1856. He knew this repeal would help him in the South.

But what of the North?

“By God, I know it will raise a hell of a storm there,” he declared.

He was right. It did. It raised a regular tornado that blew both the great parties into bits, and eventually whirled the nation into civil war.

Meetings of protest and indignation flared up spontaneously in hundreds of cities and villages and hamlets. Stephen Arnold Douglas was denounced as the “traitor Arnold.” People said that he had been named after Benedict Arnold. He was branded as a modern Judas, and presented with thirty pieces of silver. He was given a rope and told to hang himself.

The churches leaped into the fight with a holy frenzy. Three thousand and fifty clergymen in New England wrote a protest “in the name of Almighty God and in His presence,” and laid it before the Senate. Fiery and indignant editorials fed the flames of public indignation. In Chicago even the Democratic papers turned upon Douglas with vindictive fierceness.

Congress adjourned in August, and Douglas started home. Amazed at the sights that met his eyes, he declared afterward that he could have traveled all the way from Boston to Illinois by the light of burning effigies of himself hanging by the neck.

Daring and defiant, he announced that he was going to speak in Chicago. The hatred against him there, in his own home town, amounted to nothing less than fanaticism. The press assailed him, and wrathful ministers demanded that he never again be permitted to “pollute the pure air of Illinois with his perfidious breath.” Men rushed to the hardware stores, and, by sundown, there wasn't another revolver left for sale in all the city. His enemies swore that he should never live to defend his infamous deeds.

The moment Douglas entered the city, boats in the harbor lowered their flags to half-mast; and bells in a score of churches tolled, mourning the death of Liberty.

The night that he spoke was one of the hottest Chicago had ever known. Perspiration rolled down the faces of men as they sat idling in their chairs. Women fainted as they struggled to get out to the shore of the lake where they could sleep on the cool sands. Horses fell in their harness and lay dying in the streets.

But notwithstanding the heat, thousands of excited men, guns in their pockets, flocked to hear Douglas. No hall in Chicago could hold the throng. They packed a public square, and hundreds stood on balconies and sat astride the roofs of near-by houses.

The very first sentence that Douglas uttered was greeted with groans and hisses. He continued to talk—or, at least, he continued to try—and the audience yelled and booed and sang insulting songs and called him names that are unprintable.

His excited partizans wanted to start a fight. Douglas begged them to be quiet. He would tame the mob. He kept on trying, but he kept on failing. When he denounced the “Chicago Tribune,” the great gathering cheered the paper. When he threatened to stand there all night unless they let him speak, eight thousand voices sang: “We won't go home until morning. We won't go home until morning.”

It was a Saturday night. Finally, after four hours of futility and insult, Douglas took out his watch and shouted at the howling, bellowing, milling mob: “It is now Sunday morning, I'll go to church. And you can go to hell.”

Exhausted, he gave up and left the speaker's stand. The Little Giant had met humiliation and defeat for the first time in his life.

The next morning the papers told all about it; and down in Springfield, a proud, plump brunette, trembling on the brink of middle age, read it with peculiar satisfaction. Fifteen years before, she had dreamed of being Mrs. Douglas. For years she had watched him mount on wings until he had become the most popular and powerful leader in the nation, while her husband had gone down in humiliating defeat; and, deep in her heart, she resented it.

But now, thank God, the haughty Douglas was doomed. He had split his own party in his own State. And just before the election. This was Lincoln's chance. And Mary Lincoln knew it—his chance to win back the public favor that he had lost in 1848, his chance to reinstate himself politically, his chance to be elected to the United States Senate. True, Douglas still had four more years to serve. But his colleague was coming up for reelection in a few months.

And who was his colleague? A swaggering, pugnacious Irishman named Shields. Mary Lincoln had an old score to settle with Shields, too. Back in 1842, largely because of insulting letters that she herself had written, Shields had challenged Lincoln to a duel; and the two of them, armed with cavalry swords and accompanied by their seconds, had met on a sand-bar in the Mississippi River, prepared to kill each other. But, at the last moment, friends interceded and prevented bloodshed. Since that time, Shields had gone up in politics, but Lincoln had gone down.

But now Lincoln had struck bottom, and had started to rebound. The repeal of the Missouri Compromise had, as he said, “aroused” him. He could no longer remain quiet. He was determined to strike with all the vigor and conviction of his soul.

So he began preparing his speech, working for weeks in the State library, consulting histories, mastering facts, classifying, clarifying, studying all the hot debates that had been thundered back and forth across the Senate chamber during the stormy passage of this bill.

On October 3 the State Fair opened at Springfield. Thousands of farmers poured into town; men bringing their prize hogs and horses, their cattle and corn; women fetching their jellies and jam, their pies and preserves. But these displays were all but forgotten in the excitement of another attraction. For weeks it had been advertised that Douglas was to speak the opening day of the fair, and political leaders from all parts of the State had thronged there to hear him.

That afternoon he spoke for more than three hours, going over his record, explaining, defending, attacking. He hotly denied that he was trying either “to legislate slavery into a territory or to exclude it therefrom.” Let the people in a territory do whatever they pleased about slavery.

“Surely,” he shouted, “if the people of Kansas and Nebraska are able to govern themselves, surely they are able to govern a few miserable Negroes.”

Lincoln sat near the front, listening to every word, weighing every argument. When Douglas finished, Lincoln declared: “I'll hang his hide on the fence to-morrow.”

The next morning handbills were scattered all over town and the fair-grounds, announcing that Lincoln would reply to Douglas. The public interest was intense, and before two o'clock every seat was occupied in the hall where the speaking was to take place. Presently Douglas appeared and sat on the platform. As usual, he was immaculately attired and faultlessly groomed.

Mary Lincoln was already in the audience. Before leaving the house that morning she had vigorously brushed Lincoln's coat, had laid out a fresh collar and carefully ironed his best tie. She was anxious to have him appear to advantage. But the day was hot, and Lincoln knew the air in the hall would be oppressive. So he strode onto the platform without a coat, without a vest, without a collar, without a tie. His long, brown, skinny neck rose out of the shirt that hung loosely on his gaunt frame. His hair was disordered, his boots rusty and unkempt. One single knitted “gallis” held up his short, ill-fitting trousers.

At the first sight of him, Mary Lincoln flushed with anger and embarrassment. She could have wept in her disappointment and despair.

No one dreamed of it at the time, but we know now that this homely man, whose wife was ashamed of him, was starting out that hot October afternoon on a career that was to give him a place among the immortals.

That afternoon, he made the first great speech of his life. If all the addresses that he had made previously were collected and placed in one book, and those that he made from that afternoon on were placed in another volume, you could hardly believe that the same man was the author of them all. It was a new Lincoln speaking that day—a Lincoln stirred to the depths by a mighty wrong, a Lincoln pleading for an oppressed race, a Lincoln touched and moved and lifted up by moral grandeur.

He reviewed the history of slavery, and gave five fiery reasons for hating it.

But with lofty tolerance, he declared: “I have no prejudice against the Southern people. They are just what we would be in their situation. If slavery did not now exist among them, they would not introduce it. If it did now exist among us, we should not instantly give it up. When Southern people tell us they are no more responsible for the origin of slavery than we are, I acknowledge the fact. When it is said that the institution exists, and that it is very difficult to get rid of it in any satisfactory way, I can understand and appreciate the saying. I surely will not blame them for not doing what I should not know how to do myself. If all earthly power were given me, I should not know what to do with the existing institution.”

For more than three hours, with the perspiration rolling down his face, he continued to answer Douglas, revealing the senator's sophistry, showing the utter falseness of his position.

It was a profound speech, and it made a profound impression. Douglas winced and writhed under it. Time after time he rose to his feet and interrupted Lincoln.

The election wasn't far off. Progressive young Democrats were already bolting the ticket and attacking Douglas, and when the voters of Illinois cast their ballots, the Douglas Democrats were overwhelmed.

Senators were chosen in those days by the State legislatures; and the Illinois Legislature met in Springfield on February 8, 1855, for that purpose. Mrs. Lincoln had bought a new dress and hat for the occasion and her brother-in-law, Ninian W. Edwards, had with sanguine anticipation arranged for a reception to be given that night in Senator Lincoln's honor.

On the first ballot, Lincoln led all the other candidates, and came within six votes of victory. But he steadily lost after that; and on the tenth ballot he was definitely defeated, and Lyman W. Trumbull was elected.

Lyman Trumbull had married Julia Jayne, a young woman who had been bridesmaid at Mary Lincoln's wedding and probably had been the most intimate friend that Mrs. Lincoln ever had. Mary and Julia sat side by side in the balcony of the Hall of Representatives that afternoon, watching the senatorial election; and when the victory of Julia's husband was announced, Mrs. Lincoln turned in a temper and walked out of the building. Her anger was so fierce, and her jealousy was so galling, that from that day on, to the end of her life, she never again spoke to Julia Trumbull.

Saddened and depressed, Lincoln returned to his dingy law office with the ink-stain on the wall and the garden seeds sprouting in the dust on top of the bookcase.

A week later he hitched up Old Buck and once more started driving over the unsettled prairies, from one country courthouse to another. But his heart was no longer in the law. He talked now of little else but politics and slavery. He said that the thought of millions of people held in bondage continually made him miserable. His periods of melancholy returned now more frequently than ever; and they were more prolonged and more profound.

One night he was sharing a bed with another lawyer in a country tavern. His companion awoke at dawn and found Lincoln sitting in his nightshirt on the edge of the bed, brooding, dejected, mumbling to himself, lost in unseeing abstraction. When at last he spoke, the first words were:

“I tell you this nation cannot endure permanently half slave and half free.”

Shortly after this a colored woman in Springfield came to Lincoln with a pitiful story. Her son had gone to St. Louis and taken a job on a Mississippi steamboat. When he arrived in New Orleans he was thrown into jail. He had been born free, but he had no papers to prove it. So he was kept in prison until his boat left. Now he was going to be sold as a slave to pay the prison expenses.

Lincoln took the case to the Governor of Illinois. The governor replied that he had no right or power to interfere. In response to a letter, the Governor of Louisiana replied that he couldn't do anything, either. So Lincoln went back to see the Governor of Illinois a second time, urging him to act, but the governor shook his head.

Lincoln rose from his chair, exclaiming with unusual emphasis: “By God, Governor, you may not have the legal power to secure the release of this poor boy, but I intend to make the ground in this country too hot for the foot of a slave-owner.”

The next year Lincoln was forty-six, and he confided to his friend Whitney that he “kinder needed” glasses; so he stopped at a jewelry store and bought his first pair—for thirty-seven and a half cents.

13

一八五四年,林肯身上发生了一件惊天动地的大事。事情的起源是《密苏里妥协案》的废除。《密苏里妥协案》的情况大致是这样的:

一八一九年,密苏里想要作为蓄奴州加入联邦。北方拒绝了密苏里的请求,局势一下子变得紧张起来。终于,那个时代出色的公众人物们经过不断努力和周旋,最终签署了我们现在熟知的《密苏里妥协案》。自此,南方得到了他们想要的:将密苏里作为蓄奴州纳入联邦。北方也得到了他们想要的:密苏里南面边界以北的任何西部区域都不允许蓄奴。

人们认为这份妥协案能够平息关于奴隶制的纷争,事实上它确实起了作用,只是维持的时间并不长。但是现在,距妥协案签署三十多年后,道格拉斯却意欲废除这份协议。妥协案一旦废除,密西西比河以西,面积相当于最初十三个州的大片区域便会因奴隶制的祸害而满目疮痍。为了废除妥协案,道格拉斯在国会中进行了长久而又艰难的斗争。这场斗争持续了好几个月。议员们在众议院中展开了激烈的辩论,甚至有议员跳上桌子,还拿出了闪着寒光的刀枪。后来,道格拉斯进行了一场慷慨激昂又动人心魄的演讲,从午夜一直持续到黎明。于是一八五四年三月四日,议会通过了道格拉斯的提案。这是一件惊天动地的大事。信差们穿梭在仍沉睡着的华盛顿市的大街小巷,大声地宣布着这个消息。海军司令部炮声隆隆,欢迎着一个新时代的到来——一个注定要浸满鲜血的时代。

道格拉斯为什么要这么做?似乎没有人知道。戴着无边便帽的历史学家们至今仍对此争论不休。但有一点我们是可以确定的:道格拉斯希望赢得一八五六年的总统大选。他知道废除妥协案能帮助他获得南方的支持。

那北方怎么办?

“说实话,我知道这件事会给北方带来一场猛烈的风暴。”道格拉斯说。

他说得没错。事实也确实如此。这件事掀起了一场飓风,两大党派也因此被撕扯得支离破碎。最终,这场飓风将整个国家卷入了内战之中。

充满愤怒的抗议集会瞬间燃遍了数百座城镇和乡村。人们疯狂地谴责史蒂芬·道格拉斯,称他为“叛徒阿诺德”(2),还说他当初是按照本尼迪克特·阿诺德取的名字。他被贴上了“现代犹大”的标签。人们送了他三十块银币(3),还给了他一根绳子,让他自我了断。

教会也发起了愤怒而神圣的抗议。新英格兰的三千零五十名牧师“以万能的上帝和圣灵之名”,联合向参议员递交了一封抗议信。社会舆论更是沸沸扬扬,那些激烈的言论助长着大众的愤怒。在芝加哥,即便是民主党的报纸也开始用无比恶毒的言辞讨伐道格拉斯。

八月,国会休会,于是道格拉斯返回了家乡。沿途所见的景象让他十分震惊。后来他说,一路上只见人们焚烧着他那脖子上绞着绳子的肖像,熊熊的火光足以照亮他从波士顿回到伊利诺伊州的路途。

道格拉斯并不是逆来顺受的怯懦之人,于是他宣布要在芝加哥进行演说。在他的家乡,人们因为这件事几近疯狂地憎恨他。报纸上满是质问他的文章。怒不可遏的牧师们声称绝不允许他“再用口中那不忠的气息污染伊利诺伊州的空气”。男人们冲到了五金店,等到了日落的时候,整个城市所有的左轮手枪都卖完了。他的敌人们发誓不会让他活到为自己臭名昭著的罪行辩护那天。

道格拉斯踏入芝加哥的那一刻,港口的船只全都降了半旗,二十几个教堂一齐敲响了丧钟,哀悼自由的死亡。

他进行演说的那一晚是芝加哥有史以来最热的一晚。男人们懒散地坐在椅子上,汗水顺着他们的脸颊流了下来。女人们争先恐后地向湖畔蜂拥而去,只为在凉爽的沙地上睡个好觉。在推搡的过程中,好多女人晕了过去。套着马具的马儿热得倒在大街上,奄奄一息。

尽管天气十分炎热,仍有数以千计兴奋的男人在口袋中塞上枪,成群结队地去听道格拉斯的演说。芝加哥没有能容纳那么多人的会堂,因此道格拉斯决定在公共广场发表演说。广场里人山人海,还有数百人站在阳台上,甚至还有人跨坐在周边的屋顶上。

道格拉斯一开口说话,听众便报以抱怨的咆哮和嘘声。他继续演说——或者说,继续尝试演说——听众则继续发出嘘声,并大声地谩骂起来,还唱起了侮辱他的歌曲。那连篇的脏话猥琐得不堪入耳,实在是无法写成文字印刷出版,因此这里便不再细述了。

道格拉斯的随从们也激动起来,恨不得和这些人打上一架。道格拉斯却恳求他们安静,他说自己可以制服这些暴徒。他不断尝试控制局面,却不断失败。当他诋毁《芝加哥论坛报》的时候,台下的人群便为这份报纸欢呼。他威胁说如果听众不安静下来听他演说,他就在这里站一整夜。台下响起了八千人的合唱声:“天不亮,我们就不回家。天不亮,我们就不回家。”

那是周六晚上。最终,经过了四个小时徒劳的尝试,受尽侮辱的道格拉斯拿出了手表,对着台下咆哮着、怒吼着、乱哄哄的人们喊道:“现在已经是周日早上了。我要去教堂了,你们也可以去地狱了。”

精疲力竭的道格拉斯终于放弃了,默默地走下了讲台。风光无限的小巨人人生中第一次尝到了失败和屈辱的滋味。

第二天早上,各大报纸铺天盖地地详细报道了这件事的来龙去脉。而对这些报道最为满意的,莫过于远在春田市的一位高傲而丰满,有着深褐色头发的中年妇女。十五年前,她曾梦想成为道格拉斯夫人。这么多年来,她眼睁睁地看着道格拉斯平步青云,成了全国最受欢迎、最有权势的政治领袖,而与此同时,自己的丈夫却一次一次地遭受挫折,受尽屈辱,因此她心里是非常痛恨这一切的。

不过现在,谢天谢地,傲慢的道格拉斯终于倒霉了。他在自己的州内分裂了自己的党派,而且还是在大选前夕。这可是林肯的好机会。玛丽·林肯心里非常清楚,现在是林肯的最佳时机——他不仅能赢回一八四八年失去的民众的支持,还可以借此重回政治舞台,当选为国会议员。没错,道格拉斯确实还有四年的任期,但他的同事几个月后就得面临改选了。

他的同事是谁呢?他的同事便是趾高气昂而又好斗的爱尔兰人希尔兹(Shields)。玛丽·林肯和他还有一笔旧账要算。早在一八四二年,估计是因为玛丽写了几封信羞辱希尔兹,希尔兹一怒之下向林肯发起决斗。两个人配着马刀,在助手的陪伴下来到了密西西比河的一处沙堤上,准备决一死战。幸好最后关头朋友们竭力调解,最终没有发生流血事件。自那以后,希尔兹的仕途扶摇直上,而林肯却每况愈下。

但现在,已经触底的林肯开始反弹了。他自己也说,《密苏里妥协案》的废除“唤醒”了他。他再也不能保持沉默。现在的他已决定加入战斗,用灵魂中所有的力量和信仰去战斗。

于是他开始准备自己的演说。他在州图书馆里埋头工作了几个星期,翻阅了很多历史书籍,掌握了大量的史实,并将它们分类整理。当年,这项议案的通过之路可谓血雨腥风,议员们你来我往,进行了一连串狂风暴雨般的激烈辩论。林肯在准备演说期间也将这些辩论仔细研究了一番。

十月三日,州集会在春田市开幕了。成千上万的农民涌入了市中:男人们带来了上等的猪、马、牛和谷物,女人们拿来了果冻、果酱、馅饼和蜜饯。但是对于民众来说,集会上的这些物品远不如另一件事来得有吸引力。而这件事,早已在这几个星期里被宣扬得沸沸扬扬:道格拉斯将会在集会的第一天发表演说。因此,春田市聚集了州内各党派前来聆听道格拉斯演讲的政客。

那天下午,道格拉斯的演说持续了三个多小时。他回顾了自己的言论,并对此做出解释。他为自己的观点辩解,同时也向反对意见进行了攻击。他激烈地否认自己“试图在某个地区将奴隶制合法化”,同时也否认自己“试图将奴隶制赶出某个区域”。他认为,奴隶制的去留应该由各州的人民自己做决定。

“当然,”他大声喊道,“如果堪萨斯州和内布拉斯加州的人民有能力实现自治,他们肯定也有能力管好那几个可怜的黑奴。”

林肯坐在前排,仔细地聆听着道格拉斯说的每个字,默默地权衡着他的每一个论据。待道格拉斯演讲结束后,林肯宣布道:“明天,我将揭开他的谬误之处。”

第二天早晨,春田市的每个角落都撒满了林肯将要答复道格拉斯的宣传单,市集中更是俯拾即是。民众的兴趣非常强烈,还不到两点钟,演讲大厅已经座无虚席。没过多久,道格拉斯也来了,气度非凡地坐在演讲台上。和往常一样,他仍旧衣着光鲜,打扮得无可挑剔。

玛丽·林肯早早便坐在了观众席中。那天早晨出门前,她兴奋地为林肯刷干净外套,并拿出了一件新衬领,仔细地将他最好的领带熨烫整齐。她非常希望林肯能在仪表上给民众留下一个好印象。但是那天非常炎热,林肯知道讲堂里的空气到时一定闷热得令人难受,于是他没穿外套,没穿背心,没戴衬领,没系领带,只穿着衬衣便走上了讲台。他的衬衣松松垮垮地罩在瘦削的骨架上,颀长而嶙峋的棕色脖子突兀地露在衬衣上方。他的头发乱糟糟的,脚上的靴子又脏又破,还有那根被称为“单带裤”的裤带,吊着他那条又短又不合身的裤子。

一看到丈夫的模样,玛丽·林肯又气恼又失望。她窘迫得满脸通红,差点儿没绝望得流下眼泪来。

当时没有人能想到——但是我们很清楚——这个其貌不扬、让妻子感到羞耻的男人,就在那个炎热的十月的下午,走上了一条注定要永垂不朽的道路。

那天下午,他发表了一生中最伟大的一次演说。如果以那天下午作为分界线,将林肯在那天下午之前及之后发表的演说分别集结成册,再将两本书放在一起比较,你很难相信它们出自同一人。因为那天下午发表演说的是一个全新的林肯——一个因为世间不义而愤然觉醒的林肯;一个为了受压迫的民族而恳切发声的林肯;一个为了人类道德尊严而动容、振奋的林肯。

他回顾了奴隶制的历史,并给出了厌弃奴隶制的五个强有力的理由。

同时,他的演讲也表现出了相当崇高的宽容。他说:“我对南方人民并没有偏见。如果处在他们的位置,我们也会做他们现在做的事。如果他们身边不存在奴隶制,那么他们也不会引进这一制度。如果我们身边存在着奴隶制,我们也不会立刻就摒弃它。所以,当南方人民说,他们和我们一样,对奴隶制的兴起并不负责时,我是赞同的。当人们说现存的奴隶制很难用一种令人满意的方式废除时,我理解同时也认可这种说法,因为我不会为那些我自己也不知道该如何做的事而责怪别人做得不好。即便我现在权倾天下,也不知道该如何处理现存的制度。”

三个多小时过去了。汗水从林肯的脸上滚落,但他却浑然不知,有理有据地回应道格拉斯,指出那位参议员演说中的诡辩和绝对的立场错误。

这是一场意义深远的演说,同时也是一场一定能给人留下深刻记忆的演说。道格拉斯坐在台下,皱眉蹙额,内心翻腾。他甚至时不时地站起来打断林肯。

新的选举时刻就快到了。民主党中的年轻进步人士一边攻击道格拉斯,一边四处争取选票。于是,当伊利诺伊州的选民们投票的时候,民主党中支持道格拉斯的成员受到了毁灭性的打击。

在那个时代,参议员是由州议会选出来的。为此,伊利诺伊州州议会于一八五五年二月八日在春田市召开了会议。为了这个场合,林肯夫人特意买了一件新礼服和一顶新帽子,而她的姐夫尼尼安·爱德华也信心满满地为参议员林肯安排着当天晚上的接待会。

第一轮投票的时候,林肯领先其他候选人,但仅有六票的优势。随着投票的进行,他的票数渐渐落后。到第十轮投票的时候,他已完全落后了。最后,李曼·特朗布尔(Lyman W. Trumbull)当选为州参议员。

李曼·特朗布尔的妻子茱莉亚·杰恩(Julia Jayne)是玛丽·林肯结婚时的女傧相,也曾是玛丽·林肯最亲密的朋友。那天下午,玛丽和茱莉亚并肩坐在众议院的包间里,紧张地关注着参议员的选举。当宣布茱莉亚的丈夫当选时,林肯夫人非常生气,头也不回地走出了大楼。对于这样的结果,玛丽怒气冲冲,妒火中烧,因此从那时起直至生命终结,她再也没有和茱莉亚·特朗布尔说过话。

悲伤又沮丧的林肯不得不回到他那凌乱的法律事务所,回到那间墙上染着墨水印子、从书架顶层的灰尘里长出野草的办公室。

一周后,他再次给“老公鹿”套上挽具,踏上不平静的草原,辗转于各个乡村法院之间。但他的心已不在法律上。现在的他,谈论的话题除了政治和奴隶制,几乎不涉及其他内容。他说,一想到数百万人缚于枷锁之中,他的心便痛苦不已。为此,他陷入忧郁的次数比以前更多了,沉浸在悲伤中的时间也更长了。他的悲伤变得更加深沉。

一天晚上,林肯和另一位律师一起住在乡间旅馆。这位同伴在凌晨醒来时,发现林肯穿着睡衣坐在床沿,神情沮丧,大概是思考着什么。林肯自言自语地咕哝着,陷入了看不见的虚无之中。最终,林肯回过神来,他说:

“我跟你说,这个国家不可能永远处于一半奴隶制一半自由的状态。”

这件事之后没多久,一位黑人妇女来到了春田市寻求林肯的帮助。这位妇人十分可怜。她的儿子去了圣路易斯市,在密西西比河上的一艘轮船上找了份工作。可是当他到达新奥尔良市的时候,却被送进了监狱。他本是自由人,但却拿不出文件证明这一点,于是直到船离开,他也没能出狱。现在,为了支付监狱的费用,他将被以奴隶的身份出售。

林肯将这个案子拿到了伊利诺伊州州长面前,可是州长说自己无权干涉。于是林肯向路易斯安那州的州长求助,可是这位州长在回信中也表示自己无能为力。林肯再次拜访伊利诺伊州州长,恳求他采取行动,但州长仍是摇了摇头。

林肯从椅子上站起来,无比坚定地大声说道:“上帝作证,州长,你也许确实没有合法权力释放那个可怜的男孩,但是我一定会使这个国家的每片土地都让奴隶主无法立足。”

第二年,林肯四十六岁,他坦诚地向好友惠特尼吐露自己“有点儿需要”一副眼镜了。于是他走进了一间饰品店,花了三十七点五美分买了人生中第一副眼镜。

用户搜索

疯狂英语 英语语法 新概念英语 走遍美国 四级听力 英语音标 英语入门 发音 美语 四级 新东方 七年级 赖世雄 zero是什么意思赣州市帝景豪园英语学习交流群

  • 频道推荐
  • |
  • 全站推荐
  • 推荐下载
  • 网站推荐